Skip To The Main Content

In This Section

Victor M. Hansen
Contact Information

vhansen@nesl.edu
617-422-7252

Areas of Expertise
  • Lawyering Skills
  • Professional Responsibility (Lawyers)
  • National Security Law
  • Military Tribunals
  • Legal Ethics
  • Evidence
  • Equal Protection
  • Criminal Law and Procedure

Victor M. Hansen

Professor of Law

Education

BA Brigham Young University
JD Lewis and Clark Law School
LLM The Judge Advocate General’s School

Professional Background

Professor Hansen teaches Criminal Law, Criminal Procedure, Evidence, and Prosecutorial Ethics at New England Law | Boston. Before joining the New England Law faculty in 2005, he served a 20-year career in the US Army, most of that time as a JAG Corps officer. In his last military assignment, he served as a regional defense counsel for the US Army Trial Defense Service. His previous assignments include work as a military prosecutor and supervising prosecutor. He has been involved in military capital litigation as a prosecutor and as a defense attorney. He also served as an associate professor of law at The Judge Advocate General’s Legal Center and School in Charlottesville, Virginia. He is the author of several articles and books on criminal and military law, evidence, and national security issues, and is an elected member of the American Law Institute.
 

Selected Publications

No Secret Rules on Torture, The Washington Post (2005) available at washingtonpost.com available at: http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2005/12/14/AR2005121402193.html

Going Native at Guantanamo: When Government Lawyers Lose Their Way, Jurist Forum (2006)

The Army and the Constitution: Time for Congress to Step In, Jurist Forum (2006) (with Lawrence Friedman)

Congress Should Champion the Advice of Military Lawyers, Jurist Forum (2006) (with Lawrence Friedman)

The Supreme Court Provides a Framework for Reliability Determinations; Rule of Evidence 702, 162 Military Law Review 1 (1999) available at: http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=991115

Walking on Unfamiliar Ground: A Primer for Defense: Counsel Representing Clients in an Inspector General Investigation, Army Law (2005)

New Developments in Evidence 2000, Army Law (2001)

New Developments in Evidence 1999, Army Law (2000)

What’s Good for the Goose is Good for the Gander – Lessons from Abu Ghraib: Time for the United States to Adopt a Standard of Command Responsibility Towards its Own, 42 Gonzaga Law Review 335 (2007) available at: http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=989814

Conservative Bastion or Progressive Problem Solver: The Evolving Face of Military Jurisprudence and International Law, 13 ILSA Journal of International and Comparative Law 329 (2007)

Commonwealth v. Dwyer and the New Protocol Governing Access to Privileged Information, 51:3 Boston Bar Journal 13 (2007)

The Case Against Secret Evidence, 12 Roger Willliams University Law Review 772 (2007) (with Lawrence Friedman) available at: http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1026410

Changes in Modern Military Codes and the Role of the Military Commander: What Should the United States Learn from this Revolution?, 16 Tulane Journal of International and Comparative Law 419 (2008)

Extraordinary Renditions and the State Secrets Privilege: Keeping Focused on the Task at Hand, 33 North Carolina Journal of International Law and Commercial Regulation 629 (2008)

The End of History: The Vice President and the Presidential Records Act, Jurist Forum (2008) (with Lawrence Friedman)

Pulling Rank: Reinforcing an Independent JAG Corps, Jurist Forum (2008)

The Jordan Abu Ghraib Verdict: Command Responsibility in the UCMJ, Jurist Forum (2007)

The Haditha Double Standard, Jurist Forum (2006)

The Ghailani Terrorism Case: Military Lawyers in Federal Court?, Jurist Forum (2009)

Can We be Less Secure and Less Free? Answers to Ten Questions in National Security, Journal on National Security, 35 William Mitchell Law Review 5041 (2009)

Understanding the Role of Military Lawyers in the War on Terror: A Response to the Perceived Crisis in Civil-Military Relations, 50 South Texas Law Review 617 (2009) available at: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1424408

The Usefulness of a Negative Example: What We Can Learn About Evidence Rules from the Government’s Most Recent Efforts to Construct a Military Commissions Process, 35 William Mitchell Law Review 1480 (2009) available at: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1411755

Developing Empirical Methodologies to Study Law of War Violations, 16 Willamette Journal of International Law and Dispute Resolution 342 (2008)

Avoiding the Extremes: A Proposal for Modifying Court Member Selection in the Military, 44 Creighton Law Review 911 (2011)

Use and Misuse of Evidence Obtained During Extraordinary Renditions: How to Avoid Diluting Fundamental Protections, 35 Nova Law Review 281 (2011) available at: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1689153

The Value of the Military Commissions Act as Non-Judicial Precedent in the Context of Litigation Over National Security Policymaking, 53 South Texas Law Review 1 (2012) (with Lawrence Friedman)

Book Review: Death by Moderation: The U.S. Military’s Quest for Useable Weapons by David A. Koplow, American Journal of Legal History (2011)

Even If It Ain’t Broke, Why Not Fix It? Three Proposed Improvements to the Uniform Code of Military Justice, 6 Journal of National Security Law & Policy 447 (2013) with Geoff Corn.

Books

The Art of Trial Advocacy-Effective Motions Practice (2001)

Military Crimes and Defenses (2007)

The Case for Congress: Separation of Powers and the War on Terror (with Professor Lawrence Friedman) (2009)

The War on Terror and the Laws of War: A Military Perspective (2009)

The Law of Armed Conflict: An Operational Approach (2013)