Should 'anything under the sun that is made by man' be patentable?
What does it take for an invention to be obvious?
Is the Supreme Court anti-patent or has the Federal Circuit promulgated too many special rules protecting patents?
The United States Supreme Court has recently considered a record number of patent cases and has been reversing and reformulating numerous Federal Circuit standards. In Lab. Corp. v. Metabolite, the Supreme Court initially granted and then dismissed certiorari over a strong dissent in which certain justices appeared ready to impose new limitations on the scope of patentable subject matter. In KSR v. Teleflex, the Supreme Court issued a decision that rejected the notion that the Federal Circuit's "teaching, suggestion or motivation" test is the only standard against which to measure obviousness.
What are the standards for patentability today? At a program on Nov. 15, 2007, a distinguished panel of experts addressed the issues of patentable subject matter and obviousness and discussed their views on where the law is headed.
|Hon. William G. Young,
U.S. District Court, District of MA
|James B. Lampert, Esq.,
Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale & Dorr LLP
|Frank P. Porcelli, Esq.,
Fish & Richardson P.C.
|Kathy M. Williams, Ph.D.
Edwards, Angell, Palmer & Dodge
|Prof. Eileen Herlihy,
New England Law,